Davis v. Ottumwa Young Men's Christian Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 5 party was not negligent in failing to raise issue where new legal interpretation precluded original claim, surprising both parties and effectively denying the plaintiff any viable theory of recovery
• ERISA preempted claims based on state statutes that related to an employee benefit plan and did not fall within any of the preemption exceptions
• ERISA preempted claims based on state statutes that related to an employee benefit plan and did not fall within any of the preemption exceptions
• ERISA preempted claims based on state statutes that related' to an employee benefit plan and did not fall within any of the preemption exceptions
• ERISA preempted claims based on state statutes that related to an employee benefit plan and did not fall within any of the preemption exceptions
• in finding a post-trial motion for leave to amend should have been granted, noting “[t]he evidence supporting and refuting the [original] and [amended] claims would be virtually identical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).