Davis v. Oswald & Taube

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a party opposing summary judgment under Rule 1 56(d) must “show how additional discovery would preclude summary judgment and why 2 [it] cannot immediately provide specific facts demonstrating a genuine issue of material 3 fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).