Skip to main content
· 10/6/2014

Davis v. Nooth

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 238
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 179
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3191
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • workers were under defendant’s “control and direction” because they were dependent upon defendant for payment of their wages
  • workers were under defendant's \control and direction\ because they were dependent upon defendant for payment of their wages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.