Davis v. Nielson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when, because of ambiguity or indefiniteness, the appellate court cannot say that the issue was determined in the prior action, collateral estoppel will not be applied as to that issue
• “A review of the scant Washington law on this subject reveals that a default judgment cannot support the ‘actually litigated’ requirement. Washington law (like federal law
• when, because of ambiguity or indefiniteness, the appellate court cannot say that the issue was determined in the prior action, collateral estoppel will not be applied as to that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).