Davis v. New York City Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred in ruling that a denial or reduction of a bonus could not constitute an adverse employment action solely because the employer had discretion to pay a bonus
• holding that, with respect to whether “the adverse action was imposed because of [the plaintiff’s] disability,” the “plaintiff must show that the adverse employment action took place under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination”
• noting that an employer’s action toward an employee constitutes an adverse employment action where it is “materially adverse with respect to the terms and conditions of employment”
• identifying an adverse employment action as one that is “materially adverse with respect to the terms and conditions of employment.”
• setting forth elements of a prima facie case under the ADA: “(1) the employer is subject to the ADA; (2) the plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the ADA or perceived to be so by her employer; (3
• a plaintiff claiming disability discrimination under the ADA must allege, among others, that “the adverse action was imposed because of her disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).