Skip to main content
· 1/12/1996

Davis v. Mullins

Citations

  • 466 S.E.2d 90
  • 251 Va. 141
  • 1996 Va. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
  • applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
  • applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
  • exercising discretion to dispense with counsel’s endorsement proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koontz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.