· 1/12/1996
Davis v. Mullins
Citations
- 466 S.E.2d 90
- 251 Va. 141
- 1996 Va. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
- applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
- applying the principle in a capital murder case in which the trial court’s statement from the bench conflicted with the sentencing order
- exercising discretion to dispense with counsel’s endorsement proper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koontz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.