Davis v. Monahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving counts of, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, civil conspiracy, conversion, and un just enrichment
• explaining Florida’s delayed discovery doctrine ap- plies only to cases involving fraud, products liability, professional malpractice, medical malpractice, or intentional torts based on abuse
• refusing to extend the application of the delayed discovery doctrine to claims involving breach of fiduciary duty
• “Because the delayed discovery rule does not apply to the [Florida consumer fraud statute], Plaintiffs were required to make their claim within four years of the purchase date”
• Florida’s delayed discovery doctrine applies only to claims of fraud, products liability, professional and medical malpractice, and intentional torts based on abuse
• “[F]or claims of fraud and products liability . . . the accrual of the causes of action is delayed until the plaintiff either knows or should know that the last element of the cause of action occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).