Davis v. Mobile Consortium of Ceta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that because the appellant was himself an officer of the court subject to stiff sanctions, the bond was an unnecessary insurance policy
• “[C]ourts have deviated from the terms of Rule 62 when the equities so 3 required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).