Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/14/2000

Davis v. Miller

Citations

7 P.3d 1223
269 Kan. 732
2000 Kan. LEXIS 620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the eight factors set forth in Rule 1.5 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 312) of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct should be considered in deciding the reasonableness of an attorney fee”
holding Kansas statutes governing premarital agreements do not apply to postmarital agreements because the parties entering into a post-marital agreement are in a vastly different position than people entering into a premarital agreement
“[p]arties entering into a postmarital agreement are in a vastly different position than parties entering into a [prenuptial] agreement”
parties could incorporate and bind themselves to a premarital act in their postmarital agreement, even though the premarital act was not intended to apply to postmarital agreements
awarding attorneys' fees pursuant to a contractual fee shifting provision
awarding attorneys’ fees pursuant to a contractual fee shifting provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.