Skip to main content
· 10/5/1995

Davis v. Messer

Citations

  • 341 N.C. 647
  • 462 S.E.2d 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • differing standard for discharge of Army reserve officers and regular officers is rationally related to government objectives
  • noting both that rational basis review and deference in military matters applied to policies regarding retention of Army officers, and concluding that the retention policy did have a rational basis
  • “It would scarcely be appropriate to deem arbitrary or capricious a failure to grant a request never made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.