Davis v. Mercantile National Bank of Miami Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Superior Court “has a duty and obligation to follow the decisional law of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The primary role of the (Footnote Continued Next Page
• explaining that this Court has a “duty and obligation to follow the decisional law of” our Supreme Court and “[i]t is not our function to attempt reversing viable Supreme Court rulings”
• rejecting challenge to TrueAllele, under Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), standard, which requires general acceptance in relevant scientific community
• rejecting challenge to TrueAllele, under Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), standard, which requires general acceptance in relevant scientific community
• noting in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), analysis of TrueAllele that scientists can validate reliability of computerized process even if source code underlying process is unavailable to public
• finding a method used to create likelihood ratio evidence called \TrueAllele\ was not novel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).