· 11/4/1965
Davis v. Maryland House of Correction
Citations
- 247 F. Supp. 869
- 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Arizona courts have repeatedly held that the existence 22 of a contract specifically governing the rights and obligations of each party precludes 23 recovery for unjust enrichment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northrop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.