Skip to main content
· 11/21/2008

Davis v. Mara

Citations

  • 587 F. Supp. 2d 422
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96091
  • 2008 WL 4966552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to dismiss and noting that: “Plaintiffs here have neither sought an extension of time, nor demonstrated good cause for such an extension. Instead, Plaintiffs have chosen to contest the legal basis of Defendants’ motion”
  • “[T]he Court concludes that when a plaintiff sues a state employee in her individual capacity, the plaintiff must serve process on the defendant [at the defendant’s home] pursuant to § 52–57(a) and not § 52–64.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janet Bond Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.