Davis v. Londgreen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plain error doctrine should be used with the utmost caution and only under exceptional circumstances to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice
• where the interests are “essentially different or antagonistic,” defendants are “ordinarily” deemed separate parties
• “An appellate court will not consider any error which a party complaining of a trial court’s judgment could have called but did not call to the trial court’s attention at a time when such error could have been avoided or corrected by the trial court.”
• “[a]n appellate court will not consider any error which a party complaining of a 11 trial court’s judgment could have called but did not call to the trial court’s attention at a time when such error could have been avoided or corrected by the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).