Skip to main content
· 11/8/1982

Davis v. Lingl Corp.

Citations

  • 641 S.W.2d 27
  • 277 Ark. 303
  • 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that none of the general contractor defendants “retained the right or undertook to control or supervise the manner in which” the plaintiff worked and therefore could not be liable for the plaintiffs injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.