Davis v. Lewis Fish Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the discovery of previously unavailable evidence warrants reconsideration
• in turn quoting Froudi v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 290, 300 (1991)
• “Specifically, the moving party must show: (1) the occurrence of an intervening change in the controlling law; (2) the availability of previously unavailable evidence; or (3) the necessity of allowing the motion to prevent manifest injustice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).