Skip to main content
· 6/16/2006

Davis v. Lensing

Citations

  • 929 So. 2d 1276
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 1949
  • 2006 WL 1721892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statute of limitation was affirmative defense to crime notwithstanding legislature’s failure expressly to declare it affirmative defense
  • recognizing relationship between due process protections and stat- ute of limitations, which ‘‘ordinarily . . . is the only protection afforded a defendant against the institution of stale criminal charges’’
  • recognizing relationship between due process protections and stat- ute of limitations, which ‘‘ordinarily . . . is the only protection afforded a defendant against the institution of stale criminal charges’’
  • recognizing a common-law marital communications privilege in Connecticut
  • recognizing a common-law marital communications privilege in Connecticut
  • statute of limitations can be waived by a defendant, but the waiver must be voluntary and intelligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.