Skip to main content
· 1/11/1894

Davis v. Lee Camp No. 1, C. V.

Citations

  • 1 Va. Dec. 782
  • 18 S.E. 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that payment of prejudgment interest in this diversity case is mandatory under N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5001
  • affirming district court’s award of interest on net balance of verdict after setoff
  • post-judgment interest should be calculated from original judgment date, instead of date when judgment was reinstated, because the damages in the original judgment were meaningfully ascertained and, ultimately, supported by the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.