Davis v. Latschar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the decision whether to prepare a supplemental EIS involves technical issues within the agency’s area of expertise, courts generally ‘defer to the informed discretion of the responsible federal agencies.’ ”
• The court held that “[e]ven if the Park Service’s alteration of the objective’s wording were suspicious, any suspicions are allayed by its thorough consideration of all alternatives .... the Park Service initially considered and rejected a wide range of non-lethal alternatives.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).