Davis v. Kindrick (In Re Kindrick)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no fraudulent intent because at the time the debtor took certain sales proceeds, he “simply thought he was entitled to [them]” based on his understanding of an agreement
• eiting Collier on Bankruptcy, § 523.10[2], 523-76 (15th ed. rev. March 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).