Skip to main content
· 4/1/1904

Davis v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.

Citations

  • 129 F. 149
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4741

Syllabus

<p>.L B’obeign Corporations — Service of Process — Constitutionality of StatT7X.3.</p> <p>Act Ark. Feb. 26, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 52, § 1), which provides that where a right of action shall accrue in favor of a resident' or citizen of the state against a foreign corporation, whether arising on contract or in tort, and such corporation shall not have an agent in the state or have designated a person on whom service may be made, process may be served on the Auditor of State, and shall be sufficient to give jurisdiction of the person, when construed in connection with previous legislation requiring foreign corporations doing business in the state to designate agents therein on whom process might be served, is constitutional and valid, as applied to corporations which were doing business in the state after the passage of the act and at the time the cause of action sued on accrued therein in favor of a citizen, and a corporation cannot evade service in such case by thereafter withdrawing from the state and canceling the appointment •>f its designated agent.</p> <p>f 1. Service of process on foreign corporations, see note to Eldred v. American Palace Car Co., 45 C. C. A. 3.</p>

Judges: Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.