· 7/31/2009
Davis v. JOSEPH J. MAGNOLIA, INC.
Citations
- 640 F. Supp. 2d 38
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66588
- 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,643
- 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 400
- 2009 WL 2364256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance 6 of that promise is optional.”
- “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.” (quoting Restatement (Second) § 77 (1981))
- “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 77 (1981))
- arbitration provision not retroactive where contract was not product of negotiation between equally sophisticated parties and where plaintiff had already begun litigating earlier claim before signing contract containing arbitration provision
- “[A] promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emmet G. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.