Skip to main content
· 7/31/2009

Davis v. JOSEPH J. MAGNOLIA, INC.

Citations

  • 640 F. Supp. 2d 38
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66588
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,643
  • 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 400
  • 2009 WL 2364256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance 6 of that promise is optional.”
  • “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.” (quoting Restatement (Second) § 77 (1981))
  • “A contract lacks consideration when one party’s promise is illusory, and a promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 77 (1981))
  • arbitration provision not retroactive where contract was not product of negotiation between equally sophisticated parties and where plaintiff had already begun litigating earlier claim before signing contract containing arbitration provision
  • “[A] promise is illusory when performance of that promise is optional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Emmet G. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.