Davis v. I.P.H.F.H.A., Inc. (In Re Amarillo Mesquite Grill, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding payment of past due premiums was not new value stating, “nor does the fact that the insurers continued to provide insurance coverage to Amarillo or that Amarillo continued in business after the transfers constitute new value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).