Davis v. InPhonic, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff sufficiently asserted control-person liability against the interim chief financial officer because he was a chief executive who either prepared or had ultimate control over the allegedly actionable statements
• “Though not identical to the allegations supporting Plaintiff’s [Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act] claims, these allegations put forth a similar theory of liability and are, thus, duplicative and improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).