Skip to main content
· 5/7/2003

Davis v. Horton

Citations

  • 661 N.W.2d 533
  • 19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1711
  • 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 103
  • 2003 WL 21018669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing, when identifying public policy, “we proceed cautiously and will only extend such recognition to those policies that are well-recognized and clearly defined”
  • holding no cause of action for public-policy discharge of employee for seeking to mediate an employment dispute pursuant to an employee handbook when no statute could be identified that protected the rights of employees to mediate disputes
  • holding no cause of action for public-policy discharge of employee for seeking to mediate an employment dispute pursuant to an employee handbook when no statute could be identified that protected the rights of employees to mediate disputes
  • analogizing determining factor to the “final straw in [the employer’s] decision to 20 terminate [the plaintiff’s] employment”
  • identifying as an element of the plaintiffs retaliation claim that “[tjhere was [a] lack of other justification for the termination”
  • analogizing determining factor to the “final straw in [the employer’s] decision to 20 terminate [the plaintiff’s] employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Larson, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.