Davis v. Homestead Borough
Citations
- 47 Pa. Super. 444
- 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 176
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional law — Public officers — Compensation—Burgess.</p> <p>1. A borough ordinance passed under the authority of the Act of April 23, 1909, P. L. 154, fixing the salary of the burgess, is merely a municipal regulation, and not a law within the meaning of art. Ill, sec. 13, of the constitution of Pennsylvania which declares that “no law shall extend the term of any public officer, or increase or diminish his salary or emoluments after his election or appointment.”</p> <p>2. A burgess is not a public officer.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a borough ordinance that set the salary of the burgess after his election was a municipal regulation, not a law, and, thus, was constitutional
- ordinance providing salary in lieu of expenses for borough officer was not law
- ordinance providing salary in lieu of expenses for borough officer was not law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.