Davis v. Great American Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the availability of a garnishment action does not preclude \a breach of contract action by a judgment creditor as assignee against an insurer as a remedy in addition to garnishment\
• holding that the availability of a garnishment action does not preclude “a breach of contract action by a judgment creditor as assignee against an insurer as a remedy in addition to garnishment.”
• Pursuant to § 500.3006, “plaintiffs could have brought a garnishment proceeding against defendant in order to satisfy their judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).