Skip to main content
· 7/8/2008

Davis v. Grant

Citations

  • 532 F.3d 132
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14476
  • 2008 WL 2651096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an absent defendant cannot protect his constitutionally guaranteed rights to confront witnesses against him, present his own witnesses, question potential jurors, or present a closing argument
  • finding that an absent defendant cannot protect his constitutionally guaranteed rights to confront witnesses against him, present his own witnesses, question potential jurors, or present a closing argument
  • “[I]f we were reviewing the issue on a blank slate, we might be inclined to conclude that . . . the Sixth Amendment requires that a defendant who is involuntarily removed from the courtroom must be provided with replacement counsel during his absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katzmann, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.