Davis v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• receipt of mistaken debt collection telegram held not highly offensive
• “[A] publication to a few employees of a telegraph company who are not alleged to be acquainted with the alleged injured party would not offend the sensibilities of a person who has gone into debt and subjected himself to the standard communications of a civilized society.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).