Davis v. Florida Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that utility company’s “aggressive same-day connect and reconnect policy” made overtime an essential function for connect and disconnect employees
• holding that a job function can be considered “essential” even if it is not listed in the formal job description, as long as there is other evidence of essentialness
• concluding “overtime work . . . is akin to job presence, which has been held to be an essential function of a job.” (citations omitted)
• noting that “job presence [ ] has been held to be an essential function of a job”
• noting that “job presence [ ] has been held to be an essential function of a job”
• noting that job presence is “an essential function of a job”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).