Davis v. Flexman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiffs “lack of a disability does not deprive her of standing to bring a claim for retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act”
• plaintiff could recover under a conversion theory monies defendant received for her work but failed to pay to her per their agreement
• patient lacked standing to seek injunctive relief under ADA where there was no evidence that she intended to return to the clinic
• “Unlike actions initiated by the Attorney General, when a private party alleges violations of Title III of the ADA, he or she may receive only injunctive relief, not damages.”
• clinic refused to provide sign-language interpreter to hearing-impaired patients
• clinic refused to provide sign-language interpreter to hearing-impaired patients

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).