Skip to main content
· 12/17/2010

Davis v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Citations

  • 758 F. Supp. 2d 190
  • 2010 WL 5290067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the notion that “once the forum rule presumption has been rebutted, the Court must blindly endorse any and all ‘customary billing rates’ utilized by the out-of-district law firms prosecuting [an action] as those a reasonable client would be willing to pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jonathan W. Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.