Davis v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting fraudulent inducement claim as a matter of law given adversarial nature of the parties' relationship and fact that claimant was represented by counsel
• rejecting fraudulent inducement claim as a matter of law given adversarial nature of the parties' relationship and fact that claimant was represented by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Industrial Commercial Electric, Inc. v. McLees
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-11-12· cited 29×
• Kripp v. Kripp
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-09-14· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-11-28· cited 226×
• Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-01· cited 82×
• McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-11· cited 78×
• Philmar Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. York Street Associates II
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-08· cited 33×
• Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Viking Theatre Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-03-22· cited 32×
• Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. H. Rupert & Sons, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-24· cited 14×
• Am. Bank & Trust Co. of Pa. v. Lied
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 13×
• Brindle v. West Allegheny Hospital
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-19· cited 10×