Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 10/29/2002
Davis v. Davis
Citations
- 829 So. 2d 712
- 2002 WL 31420796
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an order for a husband to pay all but three specific debts was not too ambiguous for compliance
- holding that an order for a husband to pay all but three specific debts was not too ambiguous for compliance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Southwick, P.J., Thomas and Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ellis v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-03-18· cited 38×
- Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. TrosclairCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-07-29· cited 27×
- Bounds v. BoundsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-03-21· cited 18×
- Clayton Frank Gutierrez v. Trisha GutierrezMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 13×
- Caplinger v. CaplingerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-02-12· cited 6×
- Westerburg v. WesterburgCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-06-24· cited 5×
- Hunt v. AsanovCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-02-26· cited 4×
- Bruce D. Lindsay v. Paula E. Lindsay and Christy Pickering, CPACourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2020-04-07
- Stacey Davis v. James Leslie Henderson;Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2020-09-29
- Alvin Lorenzo Mazie, Sr. v. Deonka Boozier-MazieCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2024-10-01
- Anthony McGovern v. Tera McGovernCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2023-10-03
- Louise Gombako-Amos v. Corey Rene AmosMississippi Supreme Court· 2026-06-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.