Supreme Court of Alabama· 9/2/1965
Davis v. Davis
Citations
- 178 So. 2d 154
- 278 Ala. 328
- 1965 Ala. LEXIS 900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ore tenus judgment by the probate court is not disturbed unless palpably erroneous
- ore tenus judgment by the probate court is not disturbed unless palpably erroneous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merrill, Livingston, Simpson, Harwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lankford v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Alabama· 1969-02-13· cited 20×
- Henderson v. FearyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-10-20· cited 10×
- McCallie v. McCallieSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-03-10· cited 4×
- Smith v. YorkSupreme Court of Alabama· 1965-09-30· cited 4×
- Hoskins v. NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-08-06· cited 1×
- Wise v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1990-05-11· cited 1×
- Meadows v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-06-12
- McAdams v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-01-31
- K. Nickie Bateman, Attorney at Law, as administrator ad litem for the Estate of Minnie Pearl Harvey v. Inez LeeSupreme Court of Alabama· 2025-08-29
- Billy Ray Morris v. Celeste R. Lazzari and Cynthia LazzariCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2025-10-17
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.