Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with Woods that staying the first-filed action would have prevented a res judicata bar to subsequent Title VII claims
• applying the Title VII retaliation framework to a claim of retaliation under Section 1981
• applying the Title VII retaliation framework to a claim of retaliation under § 1981
• finding the same common nucleus of operative facts present even though the “factual allegations articulated in the two complaints differ[ed]” because “the claims in question originate[d] from the same continuing course of allegedly discriminatory conduct”
• “The res judicata effect of a prior judgment is a question of law that we review de novo.”
• “The summary judgment analysis is the same for claims of race discrimination under Title VII, § 1981, and § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).