Davis v. County of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing some logic to this argument but rejecting it under existing caselaw
• applying Cotterman and finding that the warrantless, post-arrest cursory search of the defendant’s cell phone was permissible under the border search doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).