Davis v. Cotov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiffs suit was barred by Heck where plaintiff “remained incarcerated[,]” his claims “challenged the validity of the parole revocation procedures,” and he had not shown that the revocation had been “reversed, expunged, or declared invalid”
• holding that a plaintiff’s suit was barred by Heck where plaintiff “remained incarcerated[,]” his claims “challenged the validity of the parole revocation procedures,” and he had not shown that the revocation had been “reversed, expunged, or declared invalid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).