Skip to main content
· 6/24/1994

Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Citations

  • 517 N.W.2d 901
  • 1994 Minn. LEXIS 444
  • 1994 WL 278176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[ajppellants have failed to meet their burden of establishing that due process is violated, by ... the standard implied consent advisory that po lice give DWI arrestees”
  • affirming district court’s rescission of license revocation where appellant’s right to counsel was not vindicated
  • addressing whether “deficiencies” of advisory violated driver’s right to procedural due process
  • under certain circumstances an officer may need only “one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”
  • one year for test refusal and at least 90 days for test failure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.