Skip to main content
· 6/18/2003

Davis v. Commercial Bank of New York

Citations

  • 275 F. Supp. 2d 418
  • 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2917
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10369
  • 2003 WL 21415333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The severance [p]lan was published exclusively in the [e]mployee [h]andbook, and is applicable in a wide array of circumstances that are likely to repeatedly recur. In other words, the [p]lan does not contemplate severance only in the case of a one-time occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.