Skip to main content
· 9/14/2004

Davis v. Cleary Building Corp.

Citations

  • 143 S.W.3d 659
  • 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1306
  • 2004 WL 2032118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, on remand, plaintiffs were entitled to actual damages on their MMPA claim and benefit-of-the bargain damages on their fraudulent misrepresentation claim
  • “In electing rescission, which depends on rejection of the contract as written, the [plaintiff] could not also obtain actual damages on the contract, as an award of actual damages depends on affirmation of the contract.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newton, Breckenridge, Spinden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.