Skip to main content
· 11/30/1891

Davis v. City of Fall River

Citations

  • 155 Mass. 96
  • 29 N.E. 202
  • 1891 Mass. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient evidence of an intent to substitute a second note for the first, thereby releasing a party to the first, because, among other things, when the bank filed suit it attempted only to collect and seek judgment on the second note
  • finding sufficient evidence of an -18- intent to substitute a second note for the first, thereby releasing a party to the first, because, among other things, when the bank filed suit it attempted only to collect and seek judgment on the second note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.