Davis v. City of Albuquerque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Miller involved a downzoning when the landowner’s property was rezoned to a more restrictive use upon the City’s initiative
• explaining that downzoning consists of the rezoning of a property to a more restrictive use
• stating that \a more reasonable downzone or a more reasonable comprehensive plan might be sufficient to remove the case\ from application of the rule
• noting that the fact that the downzoning in that case was done pursuant to a comprehensive plan did not, in itself, distinguish that case from Miller
• stating that “a more reasonable downzone or a more reasonable comprehensive plan might be sufficient to remove the case” from application of the rule
• declining to overrule Miller and rejecting City’s argument that the change or mistake rule should not apply to rezonings accomplished pursuant to amendments to a sector plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).