Skip to main content
· 5/6/1986

Davis v. Chrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 391 N.W.2d 376
  • 151 Mich. App. 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is a duty to maintain a utility pole located on or in proximity to the traveled portion of a highway
  • holding that there is a duty to maintain a utility pole located on or in proximity to the traveled portion of a highway
  • issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury
  • “Although plaintiffs’ complaint named the Detroit Public Lighting Department as a defendant, the Department is not a separate legal entity against which a tort action can be directed.”
  • issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury
  • issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gribbs, Hood, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.