· 5/6/1986
Davis v. Chrysler Corp.
Citations
- 391 N.W.2d 376
- 151 Mich. App. 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is a duty to maintain a utility pole located on or in proximity to the traveled portion of a highway
- holding that there is a duty to maintain a utility pole located on or in proximity to the traveled portion of a highway
- issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury
- “Although plaintiffs’ complaint named the Detroit Public Lighting Department as a defendant, the Department is not a separate legal entity against which a tort action can be directed.”
- issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury
- issue of breach of duty to properly maintain pole is question for jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gribbs, Hood, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.