Davis v. Burke
Citations
- 179 U.S. 399
- 21 S. Ct. 210
- 45 L. Ed. 249
- 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1880
Syllabus
<p>Defendant being convicted of murder, carried the case to the Supreme Court of the State, but made no claim there of a Federal question. Held: That before applying to a Circuit Court of the United States for a writ of habeas corpus he should have exhausted his remedy in the- state court, either by setting up the Federal question on his appeal to the Supreme Court, or by applying to the state court for a writ of habeas corpus.</p> <p>The constitution of Idaho, providing for the prosecutions of felonies by information, is so far self-executing that a conviction upon information cannot be impeached here upon the ground that defendant has been denied due process of law.</p> <p>The question whether a convict shall be executed by the sheriff, as the law stood at the time of his trial and conviction, or by the warden of the penitentiary, as the law was subsequently amended, or whether he shall escape punishment altogether, involves no question of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing rule that constitutional provision “‘is not self-executing when it merely indicates principles, without laying down rules by means of which those principles may be given the force of law’”
- “an offcer of the United States [who] has been arrested under state process for acts done under the authority of the Federal government”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, After Stating the Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.