Skip to main content
· 8/8/2012

Davis v. Bud and Papa, Inc.

Citations

  • 885 F. Supp. 2d 85
  • 2012 WL 3195154
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in cases involving crowd control and public safety, courts have often required expert testimony to define requisite standard of care
  • “[I]t is a well-settled prudential doctrine that courts generally will not entertain new arguments first raised in a reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.