· 8/8/2012
Davis v. Bud and Papa, Inc.
Citations
- 885 F. Supp. 2d 85
- 2012 WL 3195154
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in cases involving crowd control and public safety, courts have often required expert testimony to define requisite standard of care
- “[I]t is a well-settled prudential doctrine that courts generally will not entertain new arguments first raised in a reply brief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.