Davis v. Britt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an allegation that comparable products “cost at least twenty-five (25%) less” is insufficient without identifying the cost of allegedly comparable products
• finding that the plaintiff did not have standing to bring consumer protection claims based on products she did not purchase or use
• explaining that the plaintiff did not meet Rule 9(b)’s pleading standard because the complaint did not identify “when these statements were made or whether and when Plaintiff actually viewed them”
• finding that statement on product labels 3 that the product was “clinically proven” to help babies sleep better was not puffery because the claim was not a “vague or highly subjective claim[] of simple superiority”
• dismissing allegations regarding products that Plaintiff did not purchase and only considering allegations regarding products that Plaintiff alleges she purchased and used
• explaining that the plaintiff did not meet Rule 9(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).