Skip to main content
· 11/18/1965

Davis v. Boles

Citations

  • 247 F. Supp. 751
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that objectors “have voluntarily inserted themselves into this action, and as such, depositions . . . are relevant and proper”
  • finding that objectors “have voluntarily inserted themselves into this action, and as such, depositions . . . are relevant and proper”
  • holding objectors in contempt for refusing to be deposed
  • holding objectors in contempt for refusing to be deposed
  • discussing civil-contempt standard under Rule 37(b)
  • discussing civil-contempt standard under Rule 37(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maxwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.