Davis v. Board of Regents

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “actionable interference,” for purposes of a tortious-interference claim, requires “causally-related economic damage” such as “a decrease in salary” or a “deni[al] [of] promotions, raises, grants, or the like” (emphasis added)
• holding Burk claim could not be based on retaliatory transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).