· 6/14/2012
Davis v. Beling
Citations
- 278 P.3d 501
- 128 Nev. 301
- 128 Nev. Adv. Rep. 28
- 2012 WL 2154552
- 2012 Nev. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that language that is \clear and unambiguous . . . will be enforced as written\
- considering how the federal circuits apply FRE 408 when interpreting NRS 48.105
- \[When] the language of the contract is clear and unambiguous . . . the contract will be enforced as written.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saitta, Hardesty, Parraguirre
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.